You'll find any information about sport car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about car modification here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about any luxurious car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about concept car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about classic car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

Showing posts with label about. Show all posts
Showing posts with label about. Show all posts

Sunday, October 23, 2011

What Your Car Color Says About Society

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
The car color palette may be vast, but motorists are not branching out. (Flickr user: grateful420angelina)

Even though racy red sports cars capture the imagination of many too-young-to-drive dreamers, the most popular vehicle color in the world is, well, white.

Plain vanilla. A sheet of paper. A blank canvas. The most neutral of the neutral of the neutral tones. The absence of color.

White. The color of something that's waiting to happen.

Are we the most unimaginative generation of people ever to walk the earth? Or is something else going on here?

"I don't feel the world has become bland in their color selection, but rather safer," said Michelle Killen, GM's Creative Designer for Exterior Paint. "In the past, we leased our vehicles and got a new one every two or three years. We felt comfortable getting a trendy color and not having to worry about getting sick of it or worrying about the resale value."

But that's changed. People are hanging on to their cars longer, and don't know when they'll buy their next new set of wheels. Instead of flashiness, people are trying to show quiet sophistication.

About 21% of 2011 model year vehicles globally were white, according to PPG Industries, which releases a list of popular colors annually. Two other neutral colors tied for second place: Silver and black.

Trying to decipher something about humanity by looking at the most popular car colors may be unfair, because people pick boring colors for practical reasons. Vehicles are the second-largest purchase most people make, and they tend to pick vehicles that they hope they can resell in a few years. And oftentimes, people don't get to choose their vehicle color. In the U.S., buyers often have to choose from what the dealer has on the lot. In Europe, it's more common to order one's car.

PPG found that 40% of automotive consumers would like a wider range of color choices. Automakers, though, tend to rely on safe colors -- the ones that are already selling well, because producing unpopular colors is an expensive risk they don't want to take.

The sour economic climate may be playing a role in consumers' decisions as well.

"When people go to the car, they think, 'I want to make sure the resale of this car is going to be OK,' " said Nancy Lockhart, color marketing manager for DuPont Performance Coatings. "Colors that are more traditional, they make the people feel that it's a safe tradition."

Car makers take great pains to choose colors that best fit the personalities and emotions of their clientele, said Chrysler spokesman Dan Reid. He said the company looks at fashion, architecture, consumer products and even people's lifestyles to determine new vehicle colors.

The regional break-down varies with white most popular in North America, black most popular in Europe, and silver most popular in Asia.

The Emotional Calculus

Peter Krueger, color expert at Precision Intermedia, says that some consumers may be attracted to unconventional colors that sound fancy.

"It hinges on status or class that would go into the color: I want a champagne car," Krueger said.

Fiat for its 500 has taken this strategy to an extent by offering 14 different colors with exotic-sounding Italian names like verde chiaro, mocha latte and rosso brillante.

New colors coming from PPG included wacky names. In 2014 to 2015, we could be purchasing cars with colors named Goldeluxe, a silver with an influence of a gold; White Nougat, a soft creamy white with a highlight sparkle; Muddy Waters, a tone of brown with a pearl luster effect; Grape Spritz, a blue fused with a purple highlight; and Pot O'Gold, a light green with a hint of gold.

A lot of psychology goes into color selection and the effect colors can evoke.

"Colors can actually have an affect on a person's state of mind and cognitive ability as demonstrated by numerous research studies," said Derrick Daye, Managing Partner of The Blake Project, a leading brand consultancy in Rochester, New York and Los Angeles, California. "For instance, red has been shown to increase a person's appetite, and pink to calm prison inmates."

In cars, white has a very practical function: It heats up less when parked in the sun. Maybe global warming is also affecting color choices now? White cars are easier to keep looking clean, too, so owners have to take fewer trips to the car wash.

The Economic Palette

Some people are using their color choices to show off their wealth, even if they aren't rich.

"Everybody is trying to evoke luxury, so the luxury brands are having a hard time trying to differentiate themselves," Lockhart said. Customers "may buy a lower end vehicle with a luxury color that seems stylish."

Black is on the rise because people associate it with luxury. And so are fancy paint effects: Your new car might be a Civic, but because it's covered int sparkle black, tri-coats, or a tint coats, it looks cool and fancy.

Even though the economic recession put a damper on "flashy" colors, companies will still make a certain number of cars in wacky colors.

"A few years ago, there was the trend when people didn't want to look flashy in the economy," Lockhart said. But "we're still seeing a large number of cars that are being done in purple, or yellow or orange."

They may not be very popular, but they have a big effect: "When it goes by, you notice it and you want to go to the dealership," Lockhart said. "It's an important marketing tool."

Bottom-line: Car color choice comes down to practicality, personal taste, emotion, and external stimuli like the economy. Broader color options will be around as long as automakers want to get noticed on the highway.



Home, Architecture and Furniture



Travel Info

Friday, October 14, 2011

For Awhile, Luxury Market Will Be All About Lexus

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
By Dale Buss October 11, 2011

2012 Lexus RX 350 _large thumb.jpg

BMW and Mercedes-Benz are slugging it out for highest-volume U.S. luxury car sales for the year, and stock-market swings and economic doldrums remain vexing problems for upscale sales. But the fourth quarter is going to be all about Lexus: what the Toyota luxury brand now can do – and still not do. Lexus executives say the brand is finally back to full strength and ready to fight its way up to No. 1 in the segment again, and their robust fourth-quarter production and marketing schedules reflect that conviction.

Yet, German brands are arrayed firmly against such intentions, having taken biggest advantage of Lexus’s relative absence over the last six months. And an amply supplied Infiniti has been rising; Cadillac and Buick are newly emboldened; and the start of Lincoln’s revival timetable gets more imminent. Even Hyundai has grabbed a piece of what used to be Lexus turf. So while Lexus is shifting into reclamation mode, it likely will be 2012 before anyone can determine the extent of the brand’s long-term U.S. share losses and its chances for recouping them.

Meanwhile, the luxury segment as a whole is taking somewhat of a pasting. It comprised 12 percent of all U.S. light-vehicle sales last year but is projected to decline to only 11 percent this year in a slightly elevated overall market. Much of the blame can be fixed on the March 11 earthquake and tsunami, which slashed available output of Lexus and Acura vehicles around the world for several months: Many of their buyers simply chose to wait, particularly younger buyers.

Markets-Watching
Kurt McNeil, vice president of General Motors’ Cadillac brand, noted that the segment “has been running a little behind” the general market this year. “We keep waiting for things to break out a little bit, and so far they haven’t. But October and December are always strong months for luxury sales, historically.”

Stock-market vacillations such as those over the last couple of months can wreak havoc with luxury-vehicle sales because equity valuations are so closely tied to the wherewithal to buy these vehicles, for many upscale purchasers. McNeil said that “there are a lot of high-end people who have a lot of money invested, and as the [stock] market has jumped around so radically, I think it’s having an impact on the luxury space.” The continued slump in housing values also troubles the luxury market because it limits the availability of home-equity funds for big-ticket purchases.

Steve Cannon, CMO of Mercedes-Benz USA, bemoaned the fact that “we sort of navigate from one bad piece of [economic] news to another. We’re not able to string together enough consecutive periods of just quiet. We don’t even need to have good news — just a quiet where people feel comfortable. Everyone is battening down the hatches.” Luxury sales in Jan-Sept 2011 vs 2010.jpg

Whither Lexus?
Yet, Cannon noted, the luxury segment is actually “doing pretty well against that backdrop of fragility and wounded consumer psychology. It’s not a 16- or 17-million market again, and all the forecasters keep pushing back the date for when they think it will be again ... Could it be better? Absolutely. But compared with the depths of 2008 and 2009, this sure feels better.”

A keener issue for the immediate future is whether that new luxury car once again will be a Lexus. The brand was the segment’s clear volume leader in the United States for 11 years until the natural disaster in Japan ordained that title would be ripped from Lexus’s grasp this year. In its place, BMW has taken a clear lead over Mercedes-Benz for this year’s segment title, with about 177,000 sales through September compared with Benz’s 170,000 sales. “We’re optimistic and confident” about maintaining a lead through the full year, a BMW spokesman said. Buick is in fourth place with 140,000 sales, and Lexus lingers next, with about 136,000 sales – 26,000 fewer, or about 12 percent, than it had notched through September 2010.

It isn’t just supply disruptions that have felled Lexus for the time being, however. The luxury marque was dented by some recalls of its own a couple of years ago when the Toyota Division was being overwhelmed by safety-recall issues. Probably more important, Lexus is only now reaching the end of an admitted lull in its slate of new-product introductions – and it’s new products that drive sales increases more reliably than anything else, especially among upscale buyers. Cadillac’s McNeil remarked that Lexus was “having a challenge before the tsunami. I don’t want to say [the earthquake] was convenient for them, but it has provided them a very visible reason for why their performance has suffered. But the reality is, they were suffering from a share standpoint before that.” And once the earth shook in northeast Japan on March 11, said Cannon of Mercedes-Benz – well, “If you want to use the perfect-storm analogy, Lexus certainly has dealt with one.”

Conquest Scorecards
While Lexus had fewer cars to sell, it wasn’t sitting still. The brand intensified its already-robust schedule of dealership training in new high-tech features of Lexus vehicles, a focus on “customer satisfaction” that executives believed had slipped over time. They intensified the rollout of special editions and of new colors, wheels, equipment and other options, which “for many of our customers was enough to tide them over,” said Brian Smith, vice president of marketing for Lexus. And once Lexus executives realized the extent to which their vehicle supplies would be constrained for most of 2011, they “prioritized our loyal owner base,” he said. “We didn’t advertise it and it wasn’t widely known,” but Lexus dealers’ authorized gambits included extending expiring vehicle leases for two or three months and offering “thank-you” gifts such as a free extra year of Sirius XM Radio service or Toyota’s Safety Connect system. “Our inventory was at a low point, of course, so we knew we couldn’t compete with huge offers that competitors were making,” Smith said. “We were successful in retaining the vast majority” of existing Lexus owners.

But not all of them – not by a long shot. Clearly, defectors from Lexus comprised a huge portion of the herd of luxury buyers stampeding into other brands over the last six months, and competing brand executives are happy to tick off their successes in “conquesting” former Lexus customers during the second and third quarters. In September, for instance, Cadillac’s SRX CUV came closing to outselling the Lexus RX  -- which has led the luxury-crossover segment uninterrupted since its launch 13 years ago, McNeil said; SRX sales were 4,901 units while RX-line sales were 5,003 units, but the latter included the RX 450h hybrid as well as the 350. It marked the first time the SRX beat the non-hybrid RX since March 1998, which was when the SRX was introduced, McNeil said. “For us to beat the [RX] 350 specifically – we were pretty happy about that.” Cadillac incentive levels were 8 percent higher in September than a year earlier, according to the True Cost of Incentives, a proprietary Edmunds.com formula.

Meanwhile, Mercedes-Benz reached an “unprecedented” level of Lexus-customer conquests in the second quarter, Cannon said. Roughly, for every Benz customer who left the brand for Lexus during that period, nearly four Lexus customers left that brand and came the other way, to Mercedes-Benz; a year earlier, that ratio was about 1-to-2, only half as good for the German brand; and three years ago, Lexus had a 4-to-3 conquest advantage against Mercedes-Benz. “This data is phenomenal,” Cannon said. “Quarter by quarter, we have turned around this relationship 180 degrees, from where the bucket was leaking, to where now we’re filling it,” he said.

Audi Gains Too
In August, Edmunds.com said, Mercedes-Benz beefed up incentives in the particular parts of its product line where it competes most with Lexus. “We’ll do an occasional conquest program against a basket of key competitor vehicles,” Cannon admitted, obliquely. Indeed, Mercedes-Benz’s TCI spiked at $4,204 in July, up a whopping 20 percent over its TCI in June. But then its TCI dropped to $3,596 in August and plunged another 19 percent in September, to $2,901, as Mercedes-Benz was intensifying its surge of new-vehicle launches this year with the introduction of a new C-Class sedan.

And Audi continues to ride the momentum of stronger brand equity and new upper-end products to a robust 15-percent year-to-date sales gain over 2010. Lately that has helped bring Audi a 3-to-1 conquest ratio among Lexus customers compared with Audi’s 2-to-1 conquest advantage over Mercedes-Benz and BMW, the company said. Audi’s introduction this year of the all-new A7 and of new versions of its venerable A6 and A8 nameplates have added up to a huge infusion of fresh products in exactly the space – the upper end of the luxury segment – where sales have remained strongest, resulting in a huge payback for Audi; that advantage is expected to build through the end of the year.

“We’re seeing dramatic shifts from the competition,” said Loren Angelo, general manager of brand marketing strategy for Audi in the United States. In the parts of the market covered by Audi with the three models, he said, Audi’s recente share of the mix has been 26 percent to 28 percent compared with only about 10 percent a year ago. And specifically with A8, the brand’s flagship sedan, Angelo said, “We’re seeing a lot of cars being completely speced out and ordered with all available options.”

Lexus Redux
Now comes the time for Lexus to begin its long climb back out of its hole. The fourth quarter is always important for the brand, Smith said, what with its archetypal “December to Remember” promotion, the granddaddy of the industry’s flurry of winter-holiday discount programs. “But beyond that,” he said, “we really have our first opportunity to bring production back to normal.” That means a 20-percent increase for the Lexus lineup over year-ago fourth-quarter production, a number that be 40 percent higher for the RX. “RX is our bread and butter, and its production was the last to come back to full speed for us,” Smith said.

Overall, Smith is counting on pent-up demand, current owners coming off of extended leases, and replenished inventories to add up to an outsized fourth quarter for Lexus – although the brand has run out of time to come anywhere close to reclaiming its annual luxury-sales title for this year. Still, Cannon said he’s expecting “Lexus to come in like gangbusters” to reclaim what market share it can by the end of the year; “we know they’re not going to give away all those years of being the top dog very easily.” And when 2012 rolls around, Lexus’s Smith said, “We’ll have one of the most robust years ever for new-product introductions.” If instead some important launches had been scheduled for this year and then disrupted by the natural disaster in March, he said, they would have had to be rescheduled. “It will work out fine,” Smith concluded.

But the battle for the 2011 sales crown that Lexus will vacate remains intense, as well as for other scraps of market share. . “Everyone will try to make their numbers in the fourth quarter,” Cannon said. “They all started the year with higher production plans than what the market is giving up in sales. They will push the market with incentives and [marketing-]communications dollars, so the fourth quarter is going to be very crowded ... Between everyone’s forecast and expectations for the fourth quarter, and what the market is actually yielding, will be a significant gap.”

Race to the Finish
Indeed, while Mercedes-Benz’s incentive level was down in September, BMW fired up the giveaways, as its TCI rose to $4,135, up about 9 percent from August and a full 50 percent higher than a year earlier. Despite trailing BMW going into the period, Cannon expects Mercedes-Benz to acquit itself well in the fourth quarter, as a launch of its new M-Class SUV joins the brand’s new C-Class as high-volume introductions for the year, supplementing a couple of new niche-product versions earlier in the year.

And as 2011 gives way to 2012, the combatants will regroup again. This time, Lexus promises to be re-ascendant compared with the last six months, but Mercedes-Benz’s Cannon is among those who believe the luxury segment already has been altered for the long term by Lexus’s difficulties over the last couple of years. “Their dominance might diminish,” he said. “They’re never going away, of course; they’ll always be a significant player. They’ve got product and reputation – although a tarnished reputation – and the money to keep playing at the level they’re playing at. But the air of invincibility that Toyota [and Lexus] enjoyed for a time, when for many years it felt they could do no wrong, is gone.”

Dale Buss:  is a frequent contributor to AutoObserver.com.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Technology



Education Information

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

3 Things About The 2010 Ford Taurus [VIDEO]

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

The Ford Taurus was thoroughly redesigned for 2010. Those who remember the midsize family hauler from its genesis in the mid-1980’s might be shocked to see how it has grown over the years. It’s now the large “standard Ford,” a full-size sedan that occupies the space above the midsize Fusion in Ford’s model lineup.

The big story is that Taurus is now as fully featured as most any car on the road, with options like adaptive cruise control, blind spot information system and cross traffic alert. This high-tech safety equipment is made possible by radar sensors, of which there are three, one for cruise and two for the other systems. Adaptive cruise adjusts your speed both by cutting the throttle and applying the brakes, and can slow the car to below 20 mph before the driver has to take over. Blind spot information system lights up an indicator in the side-view mirror anytime a car pulls alongside. And cross traffic alert sounds an alarm if you’re backing up and it detects a car coming from the side.

A fully loaded Taurus is as plush and luxurious as even the best luxury sedans of a few years ago, yet it has a starting MSRP of just $25,170.



Home, Architecture and Furniture



Travel Info

Sunday, September 25, 2011

GM deal with union: It's all about jobs

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Jobs — and not necessarily cash, or new benefits — have proved to be the centerpiece of the new four-year contract agreed between the United Auto Workers union and General Motors.

That’s not to say the deal doesn’t include some financial benefits designed to salve the frustrations of GM workers, who have made major concessions over the past four years to help revive the long-troubled automaker.

Among other things, the union has revealed, the new, four-year agreement includes a $5,000 signing bonus, $4,000 in “inflation protection” and another $3 an hour for second-tier employees earning half as much as veteran line workers.

Living in poverty Cartoons: Poverty is no laughing matter, but these cartoons may help ease the pain.

Extreme couponing sparks backlash Maybe we should be working longer The economic toll of single parenthood USPS needs to act more like a business

But the agreement appears to have nonetheless held GM’s overall labor costs in check, industry analysts believe, and even offers the opportunity to improve productivity and lower costs still further at the automaker, helping the Detroit-based giant justify its plans to add more products — and more jobs — in the United States.

The union will now focus on selling the deal to Chrysler and Ford. If the UAW can succeed in that endeavor it could use the momentum it has gained in Detroit to help achieve another long-sought goal: unionizing European and Asian “transplant” assembly lines that have long resisted UAW organizers.

“The basis that we went into the agreement with was jobs, jobs, jobs, and I think that is what we came out of this agreement with,” UAW Vice President Joe Ashton said at a news conference revealing details of the GM deal.

Since emerging from bankruptcy with a $50 billion federal aid package two years ago, GM has added thousands of jobs in the U.S., and the new agreement could open up another 6,400 slots.

The automaker is promising to launch new products at plants in Spring Hill, Tenn., the former home of its now-abandoned Saturn division, as well as at factories in Michigan and Missouri.

Other key elements of the new GM contract include:

A $5,000 signing bonus.A provision that could add another $4,000 in “inflation protection” over the next four years. A revised profit-sharing plan that will be based on all North American earnings, not just U.S. profits. That would have earned workers $5,000 last year, compared with the $4,300 they actually received. A $3-an-hour increase in Tier Two wages over the life of the four-year contract.

Despite those gains, the new contract “should not have a material impact on GM’s UAW labor cost structure,” according to Rod Lache, automotive analyst with Deutsche Bank. Provisions aimed at improving productivity, he said, “could produce fixed-cost reductions.”

GM union leaders back new contract

That’s critical for GM — and for Ford and Chrysler, too. Just four years ago, the domestic automakers were paying an average of about $76 an hour in compensation for UAW workers, a full 50 percent more than what “transplant” carmakers paid at the Toyota assembly line in Georgetown, Ky., or the Honda East Liberty, Ohio, plant.

That higher payment averaged out to a cost penalty of more than $500 per vehicle — a significant disadvantage in the hotly competitive auto industry.

Labor costs began to come down when the UAW agreed to make major concessions in 2007 — and the union gave back even more when GM and Chrysler plunged into bankruptcy two years later.

As labor talks began in July it was believed the Detroit automakers were paying an average of just over $50 an hour — still several dollars higher than at the typical transplant automaker, and significantly higher than the newest foreign-owned factories, such as Volkswagen’s plant in Chattanooga, Tenn.

The UAW has struggled to organize workers in those transplant automakers’ plants since the first — a Honda facility in Marysville, Ohio — opened more than a quarter-century ago. Currently, only two transplants are represented by the UAW — the Mazda plant in Flat Rock, Mich., and the Mitsubishi line in Normal, Ill. — and that’s only because they were initially opened as joint ventures with one of the U.S. makers.

The challenge will be to overcome not only corporate resistance, but also worker reluctance at plants that are largely based in the mostly anti-union South, according to Harley Shaiken, a labor professor at the University of California in Berkeley.

The union hopes the relatively smooth deal with GM will be a selling point to workers at those foreign-owned factories, especially when the new signing bonus and other gains are added in.

The question is whether the new contract will be sellable to GM workers. Significantly, while the agreement ups pay for second-tier workers, it does not eliminate the unpopular two-tier pay structure.

GM’s 64,000 U.S. hourly workers will vote on the agreement over the next 10 days. Most observers believe that while noisy debate is likely, the agreement ultimately will be ratified. Union leaders Tuesday endorsed the agreement.

UAW bargainers are hoping to finish negotiations with Chrysler and Ford before the vote happens. The two companies are pressing for unique agreements, but the union is holding out — as it traditionally does — for so-called pattern agreements that don’t give an advantage to one automaker over another.

As with GM, the UAW is barred from striking Chrysler over financial issues as part of the 2009 federal bankruptcy bailout. Ford, the only carmaker not to receive a rescue package, could face a walkout, but that seems increasingly unlikely. The No. 2 domestic carmaker has generally had the best relationship with the UAW and it hasn’t seen its workers strike since the 1970s.

© 2011 msnbc.com.  Reprints



View the original article here



Peliculas Online

Friday, September 23, 2011

GM deal with union: It's all about jobs

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Jobs — and not necessarily cash, or new benefits — have proved to be the centerpiece of the new four-year contract agreed between the United Auto Workers union and General Motors.

That’s not to say the deal doesn’t include some financial benefits designed to salve the frustrations of GM workers, who have made major concessions over the past four years to help revive the long-troubled automaker.

Among other things, the union has revealed, the new, four-year agreement includes a $5,000 signing bonus, $4,000 in “inflation protection” and another $3 an hour for second-tier employees earning half as much as veteran line workers.

Living in poverty Cartoons: Poverty is no laughing matter, but these cartoons may help ease the pain.

Extreme couponing sparks backlash Maybe we should be working longer The economic toll of single parenthood USPS needs to act more like a business

But the agreement appears to have nonetheless held GM’s overall labor costs in check, industry analysts believe, and even offers the opportunity to improve productivity and lower costs still further at the automaker, helping the Detroit-based giant justify its plans to add more products — and more jobs — in the United States.

The union will now focus on selling the deal to Chrysler and Ford. If the UAW can succeed in that endeavor it could use the momentum it has gained in Detroit to help achieve another long-sought goal: unionizing European and Asian “transplant” assembly lines that have long resisted UAW organizers.

“The basis that we went into the agreement with was jobs, jobs, jobs, and I think that is what we came out of this agreement with,” UAW Vice President Joe Ashton said at a news conference revealing details of the GM deal.

Since emerging from bankruptcy with a $50 billion federal aid package two years ago, GM has added thousands of jobs in the U.S., and the new agreement could open up another 6,400 slots.

The automaker is promising to launch new products at plants in Spring Hill, Tenn., the former home of its now-abandoned Saturn division, as well as at factories in Michigan and Missouri.

Other key elements of the new GM contract include:

A $5,000 signing bonus.A provision that could add another $4,000 in “inflation protection” over the next four years. A revised profit-sharing plan that will be based on all North American earnings, not just U.S. profits. That would have earned workers $5,000 last year, compared with the $4,300 they actually received. A $3-an-hour increase in Tier Two wages over the life of the four-year contract.

Despite those gains, the new contract “should not have a material impact on GM’s UAW labor cost structure,” according to Rod Lache, automotive analyst with Deutsche Bank. Provisions aimed at improving productivity, he said, “could produce fixed-cost reductions.”

GM union leaders back new contract

That’s critical for GM — and for Ford and Chrysler, too. Just four years ago, the domestic automakers were paying an average of about $76 an hour in compensation for UAW workers, a full 50 percent more than what “transplant” carmakers paid at the Toyota assembly line in Georgetown, Ky., or the Honda East Liberty, Ohio, plant.

That higher payment averaged out to a cost penalty of more than $500 per vehicle — a significant disadvantage in the hotly competitive auto industry.

Labor costs began to come down when the UAW agreed to make major concessions in 2007 — and the union gave back even more when GM and Chrysler plunged into bankruptcy two years later.

As labor talks began in July it was believed the Detroit automakers were paying an average of just over $50 an hour — still several dollars higher than at the typical transplant automaker, and significantly higher than the newest foreign-owned factories, such as Volkswagen’s plant in Chattanooga, Tenn.

The UAW has struggled to organize workers in those transplant automakers’ plants since the first — a Honda facility in Marysville, Ohio — opened more than a quarter-century ago. Currently, only two transplants are represented by the UAW — the Mazda plant in Flat Rock, Mich., and the Mitsubishi line in Normal, Ill. — and that’s only because they were initially opened as joint ventures with one of the U.S. makers.

The challenge will be to overcome not only corporate resistance, but also worker reluctance at plants that are largely based in the mostly anti-union South, according to Harley Shaiken, a labor professor at the University of California in Berkeley.

The union hopes the relatively smooth deal with GM will be a selling point to workers at those foreign-owned factories, especially when the new signing bonus and other gains are added in.

The question is whether the new contract will be sellable to GM workers. Significantly, while the agreement ups pay for second-tier workers, it does not eliminate the unpopular two-tier pay structure.

GM’s 64,000 U.S. hourly workers will vote on the agreement over the next 10 days. Most observers believe that while noisy debate is likely, the agreement ultimately will be ratified. Union leaders Tuesday endorsed the agreement.

UAW bargainers are hoping to finish negotiations with Chrysler and Ford before the vote happens. The two companies are pressing for unique agreements, but the union is holding out — as it traditionally does — for so-called pattern agreements that don’t give an advantage to one automaker over another.

As with GM, the UAW is barred from striking Chrysler over financial issues as part of the 2009 federal bankruptcy bailout. Ford, the only carmaker not to receive a rescue package, could face a walkout, but that seems increasingly unlikely. The No. 2 domestic carmaker has generally had the best relationship with the UAW and it hasn’t seen its workers strike since the 1970s.

© 2011 msnbc.com.  Reprints



View the original article here



Peliculas Online