You'll find any information about sport car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about car modification here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about any luxurious car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about concept car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about classic car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

Showing posts with label Really. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Really. Show all posts

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Chevy advertising: really entertaining

It feels like it has already a while ago, since I was a TV show to watch and not all the ads in fast forward. Most of what I see is on the DVR, and this is a good thing.

But Sunday was a different story when that managed Seattle Seahawks, glued to a live football game to me, and meant that I had to sit map that by some. In this way I managed, what I believe to catch a pretty good run which was commercials by Chevrolet.

The American automaker, which managed to drill Bob Seger "like a rock", which has put always the eyes into a pickup truck, in the eternal consciousness of those seems a corner with the three "Chevy runs deep" spots have made, I saw. And I think something can go recognition, Volkswagen, down at the last Super Bowl with his small Darth Vader display the ad war won hands.

Chevy trots out own small child and-dad's ride scenario with a poignant Silverado display kid lovers, truck lovers, toy lovers and dog lovers all in one. It did the trick for me, as I my own 4 year-old son by the exact the same movements in the image. Skip the Seger, and position the soft acoustic guitar:

The second ad, that was me on the couch and not in the kitchen for the Volt. A man is electric car stops at a gas station in his imagination and a little child. Short, sweet and sarcastic as such as we 'em:

A further display, has for the Chevy Cruz eco, giggle me as it a couple of junge-- and erwartet--compress, to a day of house-hunting. Other simple display with a dry sense of humor... and since I was still on the couch:

Chevrolet has rewritten here by no means not the ad book. However, by one manages a detour from the brand of American machismo, my attention on a Sunday at the TV. I may not be able, through the game fast forward, which I was just had, but I had map is still the remote in hand and they cause me not to click.

What do you think of the Chevy spots? In recent times to catch any other good advertising? Click on over to Facebook and discuss.



Debt Financing



Health Management

Sunday, October 9, 2011

Are American Car Buyers Really Re-Thinking Luxury?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
The Chrysler 200 starts at $19,000. Can it really be called a luxury car? (Chrysler)

When Chrysler ran its 2011 Super Bowl ad for the Chrysler 200, all the attention was on the fact that the automaker spent $9 million on an unprecedented two-minute commercial that starred music legend Eminem. But there was a curious part of the ad's message many people missed.

The Chrysler 200 is pitched in the ad as being not only "Imported from Detroit," but also as "luxury." However, the 200's sticker price ranges from $19,000 to $27,000 for the convertible version. Such a low MSRP hardly seems like luxury.

But auto executives say the whole notion and definition of luxury has changed and continues to change as the country works its way through the economic hard times of the last few years.

General Motors' Buick brand has never been considered genuine luxury, but that is the way the company is pitching it these days. Ads for the Buick LaCrosse, for example, often compare the car to a Lexus. "Buick is a legitimate luxury car, and beats a Lexus ES350 on many features and performance, so we believe it absolutely is luxury people will appreciate as much for image as value," says Buick vice president of marketing Tony Disalle.

What is "True" Luxury?

Because some "mass-market" brands like Hyundai and Volkswagen have been introducing new cars that climb well above $40,000 and $50,000 price tags, and some luxury brands like Audi and Mercedes-Benz have slid down the price ladder to what is now Buick territory, the lines of "true" luxury seem to have blurred.

"The luxury car is the one someone attending a country club doesn't have to explain," says marketing consultant Dennis Keene.

But with country club memberships way down in the last three years, is that even a good yardstick?

Industry consultants and marketing experts point to a generation gap the "near luxury" brands like Chrysler, Buick and even Hyundai are trying to exploit. "When baby boomers came of age and money, they rejected their parents' luxury brands like Cadillac, Lincoln and Buick," says industry consultant Cameron McNaughton of AutoPerspectives.com. "You have a new generation of buyers that over the next decade will move into the luxury segment and while they are aware of Mercedes, BMW and Lexus they think of them as their 'parent's cars,' not necessarily a fatal flaw, but they are certainly not perceived as being that special," says McNaughton.

When Lexus's top selling sedan, the ES350, has a starting price of $36,000, and a Buick has a comparably priced, better styled and comparably or better equipped LaCrosse for $33,000, who is to say which is the true luxury car? Additionally, says McNaughton, "A lot of people entering the luxury car category are also going through their first real recession and they are going to define 'value' a little differently and want to demonstrate it."

Chrysler vs. BMW vs. Cadillac

Charles Kelly, a 38-year old digital advertising executive in Leonia, NJ is one such car shopper looking through a different lens. His company did well last year, even in the difficult economy, and he wants to spend some of his bonus trading up to a better set of wheels. "I had Jeep, and now I'm looking for a nice looking sedan." What's on his shopping list? It's a surprising mix: a BMW 5 Series, Chrysler 300C and Cadillac CTS. "The BMW 5 is the most expensive, but will hold its value better than the other two, but I'm looking at the Chrysler and Caddy seriously because I like the styling and they are considerably less expensive." The image factor? "All three are great looking cars and perform well, and that's all I really care about," says Kelly.

One of the ingredients to establishing true luxury credentials for a brand whose prices start at or below $30,000, which is the case with Lexus and Buick, is a "halo" vehicle. "It's easier for a $30,000 Lexus, for example, to have credibility and cachet with the wealthier consumers as true luxury when the top of the brand, the LS400, is over $70,000. Even Lexus, the number-one luxury car brand in the U.S. based on sales, though, has seen the gap between its prestige and that of Mercedes-Benz. And maybe it is feeling the hot breath of brands like Hyundai and Buick on its rear fenders, which is perhaps why the Japanese brand is launching the $375,000 Lexus LFA super-luxury car at the end of this year to boost its luxury credentials.

"That's pretty 'old school' thinking," says Ford global marketing chief James Farley, who ran the Lexus brand for Toyota before coming to Ford in 2007. Farley is trying to revive the Lincoln brand for Ford, since the company sold off Jaguar, Land Rover, Volvo and Aston Martin. Lincoln will introduce a new car priced below $30,000, but Farley says he is not interested in an expensive halo car such as a rear-drive sports car priced above $80,000. "I don't believe people buying cars below $50,000 care one way or the other if you have a six-figure super car in the showroom...this is a different time than it was," says Farley.

VW and Hyundai "Movin on Up?"

In 2004, Volkswagen, which literally translated means "the people's car" tried to go way up the price ladder and launched the Phaeton luxury sedan, which carried a sticker of $85,000 and legitimately rivaled a Lexus LS400 or Mercedes S Class, for features and comfort. But it is widely considered a marketing and business fiasco. VW also sells a Touareg SUV that can cost over $60,000. "It is relatively easy for a luxury brand with true up-market cred to introduce lower priced models, but it is devilishly hard for brands whose popularity is at the low end of the market to reach up that far," says consultant Keene.

Now, Hyundai is pursuing a similar strategy, though it has enjoyed better success than Volkswagen in some ways. The Hyundai Genesis was modeled after the BMW 5 Series, and is the Korean automaker's attempt to move the Hyundai brand up market so that it can cover every kind of buyer. It sold 22,000 of the $33,000-plus sedans last year in the U.S., about four years worth of VW Phaeton's global sales. This year, the company raised the bar higher by introducing the $58,000 Equus sedan.

Swedish automaker Volvo, which was acquired by Chinese automaker Geely last year, has never quite been considered a luxury car. In Europe, as well as the U.S. it has been more akin to Buick or Chrysler -- premium, but not luxury. But Volvo CEO Stefan Jacoby, who went to Volvo last year from a post running Volkswagen in North America, says he is leading Volvo "to a true luxury brand positioning."

Jacoby says the cars will be more luxury focused in design and features. "At the same time, though, I absolutely believe and see that the idea of luxury is changing with a new generation and that we can appeal to those who don't want to be so flashy or extroverted in showing their wealth...I think there is a quieter luxury customer that is growing in number."

Buick, Chrysler, Volvo and Hyundai will always be tough sells on Wall Street where Goldman Sachs bonuses are back in full force. That's money that sends traders and partners to the Mercedes and Aston Martin dealers. But the fact is there are fewer members in the fat-wallet brigade than there was before the financial meltdown of 2008. Unemployment remains high, as does the number of people who just aren't looking for work any more.

To a lot of people who are redefining their lives with less money than they used to have, a $30,000 Buick that drives and feels like a much more expensive Lexus or Mercedes is going to feel like luxury enough.



Home, Architecture and Furniture



Travel Info

Are Small Cars Really Safe?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Cars like the 2011 Ford Fiesta are touted for their safety by manufacturers. But are the really safe? (Ford)

The American car market is being inundated with small cars. The new models abound, from the Nissan Juke to the Ford Fiesta, Fiat’s 500 to Mazda’s 2. There are even more coming: Saab has a 9-2 in the works, BMW plans a sub-1 Series car, and the next generation of Mercedes compacts currently available in Europe will be getting makeovers for American buyers.

The force behind the wave is obvious: The thumbscrews on fuel economy standards and emissions levels have been turned, and there’s a good chance they’ll be twisted again, as the feds are considering raising Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) to 62 miles per gallon by 2025. With trucks and luxury cars (and their larger profit margins) presenting a difficult target, carmakers are throwing everything they can at the rest of their lineups. Mid-sized cars offer possibilities, but there is only so much blood to be squeezed from these stones, what with shoppers annually requesting more room and more power. That makes small, budget-conscious cars the default play to address CAFE needs.

But the assault at the diminutive end persistently raises the issue of safety. Manufacturers crow that their small cars are safer than ever, boasting features like Honda's “ACE” safety system that channels energy throughout the car and Volvo's use of four different kinds of steel. Consumers, on the other hand, often ask, "What happens if you hit that car with an SUV or a semi?" In between them are bodies like the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) and European New Car Assessment Program (Euro NCAP), all of which issue safety ratings.

Beyond The Test Results

If you look at the test scores from these organizations, most of the time it seems the answer to the safety question is in the affirmative. The 2009 Honda Fit (the Honda Jazz in Europe) got five stars from the Euro NCAP test, a set of Good ratings (the highest rating) from the IIHS, and a five-star rating from the NHTSA.

In April 2009, however, the IIHS attempted to put the safety of small cars into context. It pitted three little cars against mid-sized cars from the same maker, conducting frontal offset tests at 40 miles per hour. The matchups were: Toyota Yaris vs. Camry, Smart Fortwo vs. Mercedes C-Class, and Honda Fit vs. Accord. The results made headlines, with the IIHS concluding, "The Honda Fit, Smart Fortwo, and Toyota Yaris are good performers in the Institute's frontal offset barrier test, but all three are poor performers in the frontal collisions with midsize cars. These results reflect the laws of the physical universe, specifically principles related to force and distance."

Quite simply, the budget offerings took their lumps and so did the dummies inside.

But does this mean that small cars aren't safe? Absolutely not. What it does mean is that small cars aren't as safe as larger cars. Let's be honest – this should be obvious to anyone. The laws of physics aren’t suspended for anyone, so anyone with even a passing understanding of force should realize that large, heavy things will have harmful effects when they collide at high speed with smaller, lighter things.

First, though, let's get a persistent nugget of absurdity out of the way. To those who ask, "What if you get hit by a semi in one of those small cars?" the truth is that if you get hit by a semi, even if you're in another semi, you are not going to like the results. A loaded 18-wheeler will put forty tons of massive hurt on absolutely anything. When Top Gear's Jeremy Clarkson ran a Renault semi into a brick wall, he destroyed the wall and, in his own words, "I emerged from my high-speed, head-on impact in what can only be described as screaming agony. I couldn't walk. I couldn't talk. I couldn't think."

According to the IIHS, small car fatality rates are greater than those for mid-sized and large cars. As of 2008, for every one million registered vehicles from one to three years old, there were 91 fatalities in small cars versus 56 in mid-sized and 63 in large cars. Sport utility vehicles were relatively safer still, with 28 fatalities per million in large SUVs at the low end and 44 fatalities for small SUVs at the top. Only pickups, due to rollover fatalities, were in the same league as small cars, with small pickups posting a 107-per-million fatality rate.

Same As It Ever Was

Beyond physics, the key to the data is that this state of affairs is no different than it's ever been.

"Small cars are much safer than they used to be," said Russ Rader at the IIHS, "but so are big cars. The disparity in death rates between the two is about what it always has been. People in the smallest cars are about twice as likely to die in crashes than people in the largest ones."

Nor does it help that drivers of compact cars are more likely to test these results more often. "Statistically," said Rader, "they're involved in more crashes than big cars."

When asked if that might have an effect on the fatality stats – perhaps the fatality rate for small cars was skewed by their numbers – Anne Fleming at the IIHS responded, "It doesn't matter how you chop up the numbers, by collision claims for vehicle damage for example, even with exposure factored in the result is the same. Small cars get in more accidents."

Manufacturers Respond

Although the IIHS fatality statistics are difficult to counter, there are other issues behind the numbers. The IIHS test was conducted with both cars going 40 mph, which is an exceptionally rare event.

"The IIHS test," said Brian Lyons, safety and quality communications manager at Toyota, "is equivalent to an 80 mph closing speed, a speed and energy higher than 99.1 percent of all real world crashes."

In fact, it's even rarer than 99.1 percent, says Lyons. "The real question for a 'comprehensive safety assessment',” he said, "is how well the vehicle’s safety systems perform in the limitless variety of real-world accidents. According to NHTSA data, less than 0.06 percent of all frontal crashes occur at the crash severity selected by the IIHS."

Honda feels similarly about the details not conveyed in the results. "Yes, there are a few things that are overlooked," wrote one of Honda's safety experts. "The Fit has the lowest fatality rate amongst small cars. Individually, the Fit and Civic fare well, whereas the class may not. Secondly, other things contribute to fatalities -- like demographics and household income. Small cars attract the youngest and oldest buyers, which, as a demographic, have the highest rate of fatalities. Also, small cars attract buyers with lower household incomes, which also tend to have higher fatalities."

Speaking of causation, the biggest overall cause of accidents is drivers under the influence of alcohol or some other impairing substance. Whenever you look at accident statistics, if you take incidents out in which alcohol was not a factor the numbers can drop by up to fifty percent.

Carmakers will also say that a car's ability to avoid accidents also plays a role in its relative safety, yet many of best safety features are simply priced out of the range of less expensive offerings. Volvo didn't have any of its cars in the IIHS crash test, but provided commentary on the things small cars miss out on and why.

"Consumer Reports 'Safety' ratings account for avoidance as one element of safety," said Volvo spokesman James Hope. "Systems like Blind Spot identifications, adaptive cruise control with auto braking, roll stability control, low speed accident avoidance, and other systems are geared to avoid an accident. In small cars these systems could add a good 30-plus percent to overall cost. Also, adding steel structures to absorb energy add costs that are difficult to pass along in that segment."

Should You Buy One?

In spite of the data – and physics – that reflects poorly on small cars when it comes to safety, even the IIHS doesn't want to give them a bad rap. It says the test was done just to keep everyone honest and informed.

"We would love for people to buy small cars," said Fleming at the IIHS. "We only do these tests when we run into a spate of information that claims small cars are just as safe as large cars. They're not. And that will ever be the case as long as the laws of physics hold."

Nevertheless, buyers are going to continue to buy small cars. And they should, but making sure to do the proper research on safety before purchase.

"Shoppers looking to buy a small car with safety as a priority," said Rader at the IIHS, "can find small models now that are much more crashworthy than small cars of the past. The Ford Fiesta – the only minicar that earns the Institute's Top Safety Pick status – and Subaru Impreza are Top Safety Picks in Institute crash tests for example. When buying a small car, it's especially important to buy the most crashworthy one that you can find."



Home, Architecture and Furniture



Travel Info

Friday, September 30, 2011

Do Advertised Fuel Savings Gizmos Really Work?

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
Do these products really improve fuel economy? (Petro-Mag, YouTube).

With gas prices above $3.50 a gallon, companies which manufacture "fuel saving" devices are thriving. These companies are vying for the motoring public's dollars and preying on their ignorance.

Whenever the price of gas goes up, I receive hundreds of e-mail inquiries about such devices. So let's take a close scrutinizing look at some of these "technologies" to see if there's any validity here.

Magnetized products are anything but True North

Such devices wrap around the fuel line just prior to fuel inlet. The claims of increased fuel economy are anywhere from 5% to 20% (usually determined by their customers' testimonies).

Petro-Mag is one of the most popular, and the company claims its product works the same way cholesterol medicine works on your heart: By preventing gasoline from clogging up fuel lines. They claim the fuel activator lasts for the life of the engine.

Sounds pretty impressive, huh? But the Environmental Protection Agency says it doesn't work. They tested several products, like Petro-Mizer, Polarion-X, Super-Mag Fuel Extender, Wickliff Polarizer and others. There was absolutely no improvement in fuel economy, the EPA says.

Air swirling technology is bunk

Air swirling technology is installed in the air intake just prior to the engine throttle. In theory, it works by creating a small vortex of air, resulting in better atomization of the fuel droplets in the air/fuel mixture, making the combustion process more efficient.

One of the most popular is the Tornado Fuel Saver. That device claims to increase fuel economy from 7% to 28%, and also boasts of increasing horsepower by 4 hp to 13 hp. And they claim it takes 2 to 5 minutes to install.

Vince Ciulla, a nationally noted auto expert, says he's been testing the Tornado for the past three months. He saw increases of .1 mpg, .2 mpg and in one instance, fuel economy dropped by .4 mpg.

"So much for the fuel economy increase," he said.

There was also zero increase in horsepower, even though drivers said their cars felt more powerful. Ciulla hooked the cars up to dynamometers to test the power, and came up empty.

"The feel of increased power is what the consumer expects to feel," he said. "So it is a matter of perception."

PCV "air bleed" technology only bleeds your wallet

Products like the Ram-Jet Fuel Saver claim that by bleeding air into the engine, they break down corrosive particles that could dirty engines, and feed extra air into the engine whenever it's working hard. There are others like ADAKS Vacuum Breaker Air Bleed, Auto-Miser, Ball-Matic Air Bleed, Grancor Air Computer, and Hot Tip.

They've all been tested by the EPA, and found to be useless.

Fuel additives

These companies claim that by adding their product to the fuel tank, you will realize fuel mileage savings. Some claim to increase fuel octane and increase fuel efficiency by making engines burn cleaner. You use them by adding it to the fuel tank before filling up.

The EPA has also tested a bunch of these, like Bycosin, El-5 Fuel Additive, and Dyno-Tab Fuel Booster, and found they do nothing.

There are many other "technologies" out there that claim similar fuel mileage increases. Among them are:

Vapor Bleed Devices: These are similar to the air bleed devices (PCV), except that induced air is bubbled through a container of a water and anti-freeze mixture, usually located in the engine compartment.

Ignition Devices: These devices are attached to the ignition system or are used to replace original equipment or parts.

Fuel Line Heaters: These devices heat the fuel before it enters the fuel delivery system. Usually the fuel is heated by the hot engine coolant or by the exhaust or electrical system.

Metallic Fuel Line Devices: These devices contain several dissimilar metals that are installed in the fuel line and supposedly cause ionization of the fuel (similar in theory to the magnetic fuel saving devices.)

Oils and Oil Additives: These materials are usually poured into the crankcase.

All of these 'fuel-savers' have been tested by the EPA and have been found to be of no benefit to MPG.

Bottom line on what you SHOULD do and buy:

* Keep your engine properly tuned for maximum fuel mileage efficiency

* Keep your tires properly inflated to reduce rolling resistance and thus engine work

* Modify your driving habits if you are given to "laying" on the gas pedal

* Consolidate your errands so that you run them in one fell swoop instead of running "to and fro" about the town wasting gas

* Consider buying a fuel efficient vehicle in the first place.


'Til next time ... Keep Rollin'



View the original article here



Peliculas Online