You'll find any information about sport car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about car modification here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about any luxurious car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about concept car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

You'll find any information about classic car here

Only at http://www.egaotomotive.blogspot.com

Showing posts with label Years. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Years. Show all posts

Saturday, October 15, 2011

BMW 3-series: 36 years in the making

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota

The BMW 3-series E21 of 1975 paved the way for future generations. Here's a short history:

The all-new BMW 3-series burst onto the scene in 1975 as a bigger, more luxurious successor to the much-loved 2002. Styling inspiration came from the shark-nosed 6-series and the E21 introduced a centre-console angled towards the driver, later to become a BMW design hallmark. At launch Autocar was impressed by the 320; we described it as “zesty and smooth”.

See pics of all the BMW 3-series models

The iconic E30 set the tone for successive generations of BMW’s sports saloon. It emerged victorious in our 1986 group test when pitched against the Mercedes 190E, Alfa Romeo 75, VW Golf GTI and Ford Escort RS Turbo. ‘The perfect car for yuppies,’ we said back then. The E30 also paved the way for the first M3, which first went into production in 1986. The second-gen 3-series proved a huge success, easily breaking through the 2m sales barrier.

The introduction of the Z-axle multilink rear suspension marked a significant dynamic step forward for the E36, which also scored for its sharp styling and smooth 1.8-litre four, then the best-selling engine. When the Ford Mondeo burst on the scene in 1993, we put the E36 on a par with the ‘frighteningly able’ Mondeo — no mean achievement. Sales set a new record for a 3-Series, helped by the halo effect of the M3, which initially struggled to live up its predecessor’s appeal. Power from the new six went up about 40bhp to 282bhp.

Launched to a lukewarm reception, the E46 nevertheless set a sales record as its balanced handling, refined cabin and flexible diesel struck a chord with buyers. Although it couldn’t overcome the Audi A4 in our group test, the fourth-gen 3-Series remains the best-selling ever, with 3.3m sold in its relatively short eight-year life span. The M3 stuck with a six-cylinder 3.0-litre with an extra 41bhp boosting output up to 333bhp.

The 2005 3-series model was longer, wider and taller than the model it replaced, offering improved interior space to address a criticism of the E46. However, the styling wasn’t universally-liked, despite featuring the mildest-version of the Bangle theme, which controversially ditched the driver-focused centre console. Outstanding chassis dynamics, however, have kept the E90 at the top of the class, despite stiff competition. Ironically, sales of the most competitive 3-Series ever haven’t matched its predecessor. A fractured market with growing sales of compact SUVs and an in-house competitor in the shape of the new 1-Series haven’t helped.

Back to the all-new BMW 3-series F30

See all the latest BMW 3-series reviews, news and video

Comments: 7 Join the discussion

Previous story  |  News home  |  Next story



New Automobile



News

Saturday, October 8, 2011

After A Few Years, Smart Proves It Isnt

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
The 2010 Smart Fortwo (Daimler).

With fuel economy on everyone’s mind in 2008, the pint-sized Smart Fortwo brought its eccentric styling and European flair to the United States looking to tackle a new market. The Fortwo was designed for crowded urban driving and its ability to squeeze into parking spaces and maneuver through dense traffic was unchallenged. Sure, it may have seemed out of place on American roads, but the Fortwo had qualities that many drivers found valuable. Gray-market importers had managed to sell enough Smarts earlier in the decade that it forced DaimlerChrysler’s hand to officially import the vehicle into the U.S., and it looked as though Smart had a promising life ahead of it in America.

Just two years later, however, Smart’s outlook is gloomy. According to some staggering data compiled by CNW Research, drivers of the Fortwo are dissatisfied with their cars. In fact, CNW says that a mere 8.1 percent of New York City owners -- essentially the Smart’s target market -- claim that they would purchase a Fortwo again.

To put that statistic in perspective, the next lowest vehicle charted by CNW is the Chrysler Sebring -- at 37 percent. And the current-generation Sebring is arguably the biggest automotive disaster since the Pontiac Aztek. Given that brand loyalty is one of the most important and cost-effective ways to generate sales, the future of Smart in the U.S. looks uncertain at best.

Driver Discontent

According to Art Spinella of CNW Research, the company compiled its data after sending out surveys to consumers.

“[The] data comes from our monthly Purchase Path surveys (about 18,000 phone interviews per month) as well as brand specific mail surveys. In Smart's case, we used a combination of both, receiving over 1,200 Smart owner responses. One of the standard questions in the brand surveys and most of the Purchase Path interviews is if the owner would replace the current vehicle with another of the same brand.”

So what has motivated so many Fortwo drivers to grow unhappy with their cars in these surveys? There have been a few factors working against Smart, led by declining gas prices. But poor ride quality and the impracticality of the two-seat Fortwo also play into owner dissatisfaction. According to John Neff, editor-in-chief of AOL Autos’ partner site Autoblog, the Fortwo forces owners to make serious compromises, something they’re increasingly unwilling to do.

“With gas prices relatively stable and larger vehicles coming to market with better fuel efficiency, not many buyers are willing to accept the Fortwo's size and quirky driving manner,” Neff said.

The Smart Fortwo has also been panned for having an unrefined “automatic manual” transmission and not delivering the extraordinary fuel economy that some expect.

Spinella echoed Neff’s sentiments, adding that “the vehicle of choice as a replacement was the Mini or a conventional small car, such as [the Chevy] Aveo, [Honda] Fit, [or] Scion xB, which has far more interior space for passengers and can generally be driven on longer trips at highway speeds with more comfort.”

Perhaps the most important force working against the Fortwo right now, however, is the fact that the novelty seems to have worn off. According to CNW data acquired from consumer surveys between 2006 and 2010, the majority of drivers of the Smart Fortwo actually bought the car because of its looks and uniqueness, which they deemed more important than its fuel economy, friendliness to the environment, or fun.

But apparently eccentric looks are not making up for the widespread driver dissatisfaction. Smart did reprogram the transmission of early models that gave car reviewers so much grief, but that’s essentially the extent of the changes made to the car since its introduction. Given that Smart doesn’t have much to add to its sales pitch, sales numbers will continue to fall.

“Without new products or even significant upgrades, existing customers have no reason to re-up with the brand, and if their wants or needs have changed to require a different type of vehicle, Smart doesn't have anything to sell them. Simply put, the novelty has worn off the Fortwo,” said Chris Paukert, executive editor at Autoblog.

The Future

It is widely believed that since its initial launch in Europe in 1998, Smart has never turned a profit for corporate parent Daimler, making the brand’s weak performance in the U.S. particularly troubling. Smart USA has recently undergone a management shake-up, with new president Jill Lajdziak, the former general manager of GM’s now-defunct Saturn brand, taking over at the beginning of the year. In an effort to boost sales, a new leasing program was launched in January. Smart plans to deploy a pilot fleet of electric Fortwos in October, with a stated goal of retail sales in 2012.

“While the new EV model will generate some buzz, its limited range and practicality will still rule it out from consideration among most consumers. Further, it remains to be seen if the electric model will be priced where Daimler can turn a profit -- or even break-even,” Paukert explained.

There is another short-term ray of hope, at least according to Neff: “Another spike in fuel costs, which is likely to happen at some point, could see Fortwo sales in the U.S. quickly rise again.”

After all, the Fortwo did enjoy its only measure of success while gas prices were high. Another shock to the system could have people flocking back to Smart dealerships, potentially buying time for the company to right its ship.

Home, Architecture and Furniture



Travel Info

Thursday, September 29, 2011

How NYC's Best Bus Driver Stayed Crash-Free for 23 Years

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
New York City bus driver Michael Sanua offers safe driving tips.

If you're planning a trip to the New York City any time soon and want to keep safe as you make your way about, you couldn't do better than riding with NYC Transit bus operator Michael Sanua, who's been transporting New Yorkers and tourists through rain, snow, sleet and traffic since 1988 without a single smash-up.

His perfect record is even more impressive when you factor in the 268 crashes the most popular bus line, the M101, had in 2009 during its 12-mile daily run from Manhattan's Washington Heights to the East Village, making it the most dangerous bus route in New York City. The second most dangerous was the M15 with 203 crashes on its 14-mile route the same year.

New York bus drivers have received a lot of attention this week following the tragic crash of a casino tour bus in which fifteen people died. That bus, like many operated private companies, is among many that ferry gamblers from the city to Connecticut casinos. Sanua works for the city's Metropolitan Transit Authority, which runs buses around the five burroughs of New York City.

The secret of Sanua's success? There isn't one, he says, speaking from the 100th Street depot in Manhattan. "The same rules apply to operating a bus that apply to civilians in their cars and most of them don't involve anything too complicated. The most important thing isn't to win a beef with another driver, criticize someone who doesn't drive well, or get where you're going at the speed of light. The most important thing is to be conscious of driving at all times, and get where you're going safely. It may sound boring, but that's the secret, if there is one."

Sanua says it's important to mentally prepare yourself for any possibility behind the wheel before you turn the key, so that the inevitable challenges you'll face on the road will be taken in stride. "I take a lot of deep breaths and just chill, chill, chill," he says. "We're all gonna have our days."

Here are five more Sanua tips shared with AOL Autos:

Leave enough time to get where you're going. "I tell some of my regular customers to plan their day and leave a couple of minutes early. When I leave my house to go to work, I plan for any unusual situation like a flat tire, traffic, anything. This way, you're not rushed, driving crazy or taking chances."

If someone cuts you off, say to yourself, "Ok, that one's yours, this one's mine, have a nice day.""You just have to watch your aggression because that's how [bad] things happen," says Sanua. "The cost of blowing your top is pretty high."

Diffuse beefs before they escalate. "One time I was going downtown and there was a big blockage ahead," Sanua says. "First thing I do is call control, like you're supposed to. A lady came up me and said, 'What's the problem?' I tell her we have to wait because there's traffic. She says, 'I gotta to go work!' She wanted to grab the handset and talk to control, and I told her she couldn't do that. It started to escalate a little bit. Then I stopped and thought of my ex-wife. Arguing with her is like arguing with the wall. So I just quit fighting---refused to get into it with her. It's a good plan to stick to. Just refuse to get into it. Now we're good friends."

Keep both hands on the wheel. "That's pretty self-explanatory," says Sanua. "If an emergency situation arises, you're gonna need both hands to properly respond."

Enjoy driving. "It sounds simple, but it works, Sanua says. "I love my job, even when there's traffic. I have a sort of Zen attitude, and I just really get into driving. You can, too."

The best day, according to Sanua, is a day where nothing happens and you get to and from where you're going without an incident, beef or near-miss.

"You're gonna find a lot of difficult people out there," Sanua says." You just have to let 'em go. People say, 'Where were you? What took you so long?' I say I'm here, that's more important. I take care of my customers. You have to keep the mentality that 'We're carrying fragile cargo. Like eggs. As you go, you get more experience. You're never too old to learn something."

Finally, Sanua has a message for civilians. The only famous driver of a bus anyone knows, especially in New York City is Ralph Kramden, played by the Jackie Gleason in The Honeymooners TV show from the 1950s that is still re-run in many TV markets. In fact, there is a statue of the Kramden character outside Manhattan's Port Authority Bus Terminal. But, says Sanua, The Kramdenesque term "Bus driver" has been retired by his profession. They prefer "Bus operator."

If he keeps up his perfect record until retirement, maybe Sanua will get a statue as well.



View the original article here



Peliculas Online

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Drivers Feel Less Safe Than Five Years Ago

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
By AutoObserver Staff September 19, 2011

More than half of drivers said driving feels less safe now than it did five years ago, according to a survey for the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety: 2010 Traffic Safety Culture Index. The 52 percent of drivers who said driving feels less safe was an increase of 17 percent over the number of drivers who said so just a year earlier. The reason: concerns about increasing driver distractions, according to Jim Foley, a researcher at Toyota Motor Corp.’s Technical Center in Ann Arbor, MI.

Foley said analysis of driver distraction is a chief priority for Toyota’s Collaborative Safety Research Center, which just announced it will spend $50 million for new safety research projects. One aspect of the research will expand study of the so-called “human-machine interface,” or HMI, and how designs for interacting with onboard systems can affect distraction. Early conclusions from CRSC studies, Foley said, indicate that talking and listening to engage various functions is markedly less distracting than controls that require visual attention. One related study indicated that 78 percent of crashes were related to inattention from the driver.

AutoObserver Staff:  The best in the business.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

View the original article here



Peliculas Online

If Saab Finally Done, End Began 20 Years Ago

AppId is over the quota
AppId is over the quota
By AutoObserver Staff September 14, 2011

Saab Ends.jpg

In the 64 years since aircraft maker Saab started developing cars, it has designed and built just 12 entirely new models – and four of those have been somewhat dubious derivations of other manufacturers’ vehicles. Even for a brand whose models have been notable for their (often unplanned) longevity, that kind of product turnover simply hasn’t been enough to sustain a car company in the modern consumer age. This single factor of not enough fresh and compelling cars often enough inevitably assured Saab’s demise. As it has been known for six decades, Saab appears to be finally finished. The company’s labor unions this week called for Saab’s bankruptcy in order to secure their workers’ layoff benefits. The only remaining hope was yet another convoluted scheme to pull yet another clearly insufficient amount of money from an ambitious but overreaching Chinese investor.

Lack of product turnover led to another hallmark Saab deficiency: for at least the past couple of decades, the company has been striving – and failing – to sell usefully more than 130,000 vehicles per year, a number that for many mainstream manufacturers would not keep a single model line profitable, much less an entire assembly plant and certainly not the entire company. Yet despite all this, major efforts were made to save and reinvigorate Saab for much of the past 20 years. There were good reasons: even today, it’s easy to see the market potential held by this distinct Swedish brand. Saab was a storied, premium European marque with a reputation for innovation, unusual styling, safety and, if the advertising puffery was to be believed, a strong link with the glamour of jet-fighter engineering.

Moreover, awareness of Saab, despite annual sales amounting to no more than a few days’ worth of production for Toyota Motor Corp., was vigorous in plenty of global markets that mattered. In 1989, when General Motors bought Saab on the rebound from its failure to get hitched with Jaguar, this was a marque with serious potential, a premium under-exploited global brand – a weapon GM had previously been without – acquired at just the moment when the flight to upscale badges like BMW, Lexus and Audi was gaining real momentum.

110816 Saab USA and global sales history.jpgExponential Potential
Hard as it is to remember, Saab itself enjoyed a period of fruitful U.S. expansion; it was the fastest-growing luxury brand between 1982 and 1986 (the years just before the Japanese automakers pulled the trigger on their own formidable luxury-car divisions). General Motors’ 1990 buy-in bought a 50-percent stake of Saab, the other half owned by Swedish conglomerate Investor AB. There were several fleeting moments of well-directed effort, but GM’s efforts to reinvigorate and expand Saab, never mind profitably exploit it, repeatedly stalled. To outsiders, at least, it appeared neither Saab owner was ready to commit the really big investment needed to thoroughly rejuvenate the company.

In 2000, GM bought out Investor and by that time, Saab had already begun to see a succession of short-term, GM-appointed chiefs. Two in particular – Dave Herman, and later, Bob Hendry, who came on in 1996 – started good things but never stayed long enough to complete the rejuvenation. The launch of the first all-new car under GM co-ownership, the 1993 900, was a major disappointment. Good that it looked similar to the outgoing 900. But based on a repurposed Opel Vectra platform, the new-generation 900 lacked the quirky character, debuted virtually no innovations, was off-the-pace compared even with older rivals and endured distressing quality problems.

9-7x artist rendering.jpgShark-Jumping Years
After the 900 launch, sales in the U.S. faltered, contributing to the company’s failure to turn a profit for much of the 1990s through to 2009. Yet sales rose again as the new century started, floating around the 130,000 mark and reaching an all-time high in 2003 of almost 132,000 units, a record achieved with a new, second-generation 900 (now using the 9-3 nomenclature) and a 9-5 flagship that by Saab standards, was relatively young at five years old. What nobody could know at the time was that the 9-5 was not even halfway through its life at this point. Both GM and Saab fumbled this crucial car’s replacement, at first developing a new version using a platform co-developed with Fiat’s premium Alfa Romeo and Lancia brands. But the collaboration eventually was abandoned, causing years of delay.

The resultant dearth of new Saabs spawned some of the stranger automotive mutants of the new century, as GM scurried to give the U.S. dealer network something fresh to sell. First up was 2004’s appallingly misconceived 9-2X, the Subaru Impreza wagon-based Saab that quickly became known as the Saabaru, and almost equally quickly disappeared from view after two seasons and 10,346 sales. It was mostly killed by buyer apathy, but also by GM’s divestment of its Subaru ownership stake, which severed the links between the companies. That development also killed a potentially more promising project that had Saab slated to get its own version of Subaru’s Tribeca crossover.

Instead, the Swedes eventually got the 9-7X (concept sketch, above), a Chevy Trailblazer mutant (speedily relabelled the Trollblazer) that flaunted a Saab dashboard and grille and a disconnection from the essence of the brand more shocking than the Saabaru’s. Still, this one survived until 2009. The celebrated Bob Lutz had a hand in all these cars, despite openly confessing to having little understanding of or empathy for Saab, a surprise given his understanding and experience with the European auto aesthetic and usually trusty product touch. None of these desperate enterprises did the brand much good, of course. Neither did the decision to spawn a Cadillac from Saab’s aged 9-3, a plan that produced a fine subject for an automotive trivia question: Which Cadillac was never sold in its home market, was built in Sweden and available with a Fiat diesel engine? Answer: The BLS, already fading from memories faster than yesterday’s breakfast. The idea was to give Cadillac a BMW 3-Series contender and Saab’s Trollhattan plant more to do, but the BLS was neither a threat to BMW nor the cause of much overtime.

Plenty of Concept Saab.jpg

Plenty Of Concept
As all these abuses of the brand occurred, the company wowed auto-show audiences with a succession of intriguing concept cars, a couple of which might have helped turned things around had GM had the nerve to produce them. First was the 2001 9-X, a Kamm-tailed hatchback that appeared sexy, unusual and very Saab, followed by the 9-3X crossover coupe a year later that was even more desirable. At that point, there was bold GM talk of an aggressive 5-year plan and sales of 250,000 vehicles. Then came the dramatic and much-admired Aero X concept (above) in 2006. There was, it seemed, no shortage of design talent for Saab, but a frustrating lack of the means to realise its potential – and the 250,000 annual sales that might, finally, have produced a self-sustaining business.

GM persisted however, having earlier elected to subsume Saab’s operations into the wider Opel organization, so that the Trollhattan plant in Sweden became another GM Europe manufacturing operation, while engineering and styling for new models was largely executed at Opel’s Russelsheim headquarters. The aim was to reduce costs – although an attempt to preserve Saab’s creative essence saw the establishment of a brand center in the company’s hometown of Trollhattan in 2004. How that would have worked in the long-term we’ll never know, because GM had entered stormy waters by 2008 and soon concluded one distraction it no longer needed was Saab.

With Saab’s 2010 sale to Spyker Cars NV, a great opportunity for GM went to waste – and with it, any chance of a viable future for Saab. Despite having successfully rejuvenated Cadillac with a clear mission, considerable resolve and substantial cash, GM ignored the lessons of its own enterprise. Or those to be found in the growth of Audi, BMW and Lexus. The General failed to apply a plan of the scope, funding or vision necessary to launch Saab to the next stage of an expansion that ought to have seen it achieving annual sales of at least 300,000 units. And over the two decades that GM prevaricated, Saab’s brand unquestionably suffered. While some models met with limited success, no car launched during GM’s tenure truly improved Saab in terms of its brand positioning or cemented its distinctive flavor in the way that BMW, Audi, Mercedes and Lexus have done as they’ve developed and grown.

Saab End.jpgDid Anybody Get It?
Endless discussions inside Saab, GM and in the wider world, attempted to distill the essence and substance of Saab, to explain why it had potential many multiples greater than its actual sales. There was, for instance, no question that awareness of the marque was far higher than its sales footprint would suggest. But that awareness never translated to purchase consideration, and as the revered 92, 93, 96, 99 and 900 models that created that substance grew more distant, the task of working out what Saab actually stood for became ever harder. It was a substance that grew out of the original 92/93 and 96, the robust, aerodynamic-looking, beetle-backed 2-door that was indeed a Swedish take on VW’s “people’s car” concept, and the more sophisticated and subtly individual 99 of 1967. That car would enjoy an extraordinarily long life, bowing out 26 years later, stretched and rebadged as the 900. Like the 96, the 99 was original enough to contribute substantially to the Saab legend.

But everything since – with the possible exception of the recently launched and short-lived (and still Opel-based) 9-5 – has fallen short of that indefinable character and brand essence that continuously strengthens and redefines a marque and sustains its desirability. The blame for Saab’s failure is in large part at GM’s doorstep, though Trollhattan made its own contributions and tiny-but-enthusiastic Spyker’s attempts to successfully rescue were it at best an outside chance. So another famous car brand, and a business opportunity with potential, winks out.

Saab Timeline Start.jpgSaab Timeline
1946
- Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget begins development of a small passenger car immediately after WW2
1947 - prototype Saab 92 revealed to Swedish press
1949 - Saab 92 enter series production
1950 - first 92s delivered
1955-68 - Saab’s motorsport successes build the name, with wins in two wins in the Monte Carlo rally, three RAC rally wins in the UK, and a 1956 victory in the Great American Mountain Rally.
1955 - Saab 93, an upgraded, 92, is launched
1956 - Saab 92 gets a three cylinder two-stroke, becomes 93
1956 - Saab Motors Inc in the US is formed
1956 - Sonett 1 sports car – only 6 built
1959 - 95 station wagon launched
1960 - Saab 96 launched, a heavily facelifted version of the 93
1963 - Saab pioneers diagonally-split dual circuit brakes
1966 - Ford supplies Saab with four-stroke V4 for 96
1966 - Sonett II coupe launched, 1890 built
1967 - the larger Saab 99 is launched, with front-wheel drive and a 1709cc British Triumph engine.
Snow Saab.jpg1968 - Saab merges with Scania-Vabis, a successful truck-maker, to form Saab-Scania AB, leading to the creation of an automotive division.
1969 - Saab introduces heated seats and headlamps wired through the ignition
1970 - headlamp wipers and washers are launched
1970 - Sonett III sports coupe launched
1972 - Saab develops side impact door beams
1973 - three door Combi 99 introduced
1977 - 99 Turbo introduced, boosting performance and sales
1978 - five door 99 launched
1978 - 99 is lengthened, facelifted and relaunched as 900
1980 - production of the 96 ends
1984 - 175bhp 900 Turbo 16S launched, the first turbo engine with 16 valves
1984 - all-new 9000 launched – it’s only the third all-new model in Saab’s 37 year history.
1986 - 900 Convertible launched
1990 - General Motors buys a 50percent stake from Saab-Scania for $600 million
1991 - Saab is first to introduce CFC-free air conditioning
900 SPG-Aero.jpg1991 - Trionic engine management system. In smoggy city centres, Saab 9000 Trionic’s exhaust exhales cleaner air than car ingests
1992 - GM management has reduced the build time of a Saab by 50percent, to 50 hours.
1993 - new 900 launched, based on GM’s Opel Vectra platform
1993 - night panel dashboard, blacking out everything except the speedometer
1994 - Saab turns a profit
1995 - the profit turns to losses
1996 - Saab is first with anti-whiplash active head-restraint
1997 - Saab 9-5 launched, replacing the 9000
2000 - GM buys out the remaining shares in Saab for $125 million
2001 - widely admired Saab 9-X concept unveiled at Frankfurt auto show
2002 - Saab reveals another highly acclaimed concept car, the 9-3X
2002 - an all-new 9-3 is announced
Saab 9000 red.jpg2003 - 48,000 Saabs are sold in the US, a record, and total global sales are the highest ever at 131,706
2004 - GM announces the establishment of a Saab brand center at Trollhattan, following the subsuming of the company into the wider GM Europe
2005 - 9-3 SportCombi (a station wagon) is announced
2006 - the Aero X concept car is unveiled, to considerable acclaim
2006 - Saab’s all-time sale record of 133,167 units is achieved. The marque celebrates its 60th year
2008 - the 9-4X Biopower concept is revealed at the Detroit auto show
2008 - GM announces that Saab’s future is ‘under review’ in December
2009 - February, Saab files for bankruptcy protection under a Swedish court process
2009 - the 9-3X, an all-wheel drive 9-3 wagon, appears at the Geneva auto show
Schmee Saab.jpg2009 - June, Swedish supercar maker Koenigsegg announces that it will buy Saab
2009 - September – the new 9-5 is premiered at the Frankfurt auto show
2009 - November, Koenigsegg announces that it cannot go through with the deal
2010 - GM sells Saab to Victor Muller’s Spyker for $74 million, though not before almost closing it.
2011 - 9-4X crossover launched. Built by GM, it’s U.S.-only model

AutoObserver Staff:  Story and reporting by Contributor Richard Bremner.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

View the original article here



Peliculas Online